First name and last name*
Email address*
Parent institute*
Title of the article*
Date of the review*
Relevance of topic, technical content & correctness ---Very significantImportantAverageMinor
Novelty & originality of idea 012345 (0-Lowest,5-Highest)
Scholarly quality of article ---PoorBelow averageAverageGoodExcellent
Reviwer comments
Recommendation of reviewer ---Accept as it isAccept with minor changes and no review required.Accept with Changes - Rewriting of Article is needed.RejectNot Applicable
1. Does the introduction state the purpose of the article? ---yesno
2. Is the paper clearly written and well organized? ---yesno
3. Does the conclusion clearly stated in article? ---yesnoNot Applicable
The author has to change the abstract